Allowed a civil application in a writ petition without substantive reasoning, condoning the stated delay and disposing of the matter on the application's own ground.
The delay is condoned. The civil application is disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 ca 10508.12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10508 OF 2012 IN
REVIEW APPLICATION STAMP NO. 17673 OF 2012
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 6289 OF 2011
Bharat Engineering Works, D-5, MIDC Nagapur, Ahmednagar .. Applicant
Versus
Vaijanta Balasaheb Warangale .. Respondent
Shri P. S. Pawar, Advocate for the Applicant.
Mrs. M. D. Thube-Mhase, Advocate h/f Shri P. V. Barde, Advocate for the Respondent.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 04TH DECEMBER, 2012.
PER COURT :
. Mrs. Thube, the learned counsel for the non applicant opposes the application on the ground no sufficient cause is stated.
2 ca 10508.12
For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed. The delay is condoned. The civil application is disposed of.
[ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ]
bsb/Dec. 12
Bharat Engineering Works
Vaijanta Balasaheb Warangale
S. V. Gangapurwala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
