Single judge disposed of a bail application in a murder case. The court rejected objections to the FIR's belatedness and lack of weapon recovery, citing factual matrix and evidence of public nature of the crime, and dismissed the application.
Bail application dismissed. Accused kept in custody.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ba854-12.sxw
1/3
Pvr
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO.854 OF 2012
1.Maruti Pandurang Patil ...Applicant versus State of Maharashtra. ...Respondent
Mr.Kedar Patil, for Applicant.
Mrs.A.T.Jhaveri, A.P.P. for State.
CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATED : 5th July, 2012
P.C. :
accused-applicant Maruti Pandurang Patil seeks bail in Crime no.99 of 2011 for an offence under Section 302, 504, 506 r/w. 34 of IPC, arising out of Panhala Police Station, Dist.Kolhapur.
and his father Pandurang Patil decided to teach lesson and it is alleged that on 20.9.2011 in the morning at around 9 a.m. on the road, by chasing the deceased, the accused-applicant with his brother Sunil stabbed said Maruti
ba854-12.sxw
2/3
Pvr
Teli to death. The accused-applicant is in custody from 20.9.2011.
ba854-12.sxw
3/3
Pvr
2 issues framed by the court
Whether there are sufficient grounds to grant bail to the accused charged with murder despite alleged delays in FIR and non-recovery of weapon.
Whether the belatedness of the FIR and Statement of Sou. Nanda Mahadev Patil warrant dismissal of bail application.
Maruti Pandurang Patil
State of Maharashtra
K.U.CHANDIWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
