Bail application in a rape case rejected despite claims of settlement. Court noted trial had commenced, applicant caused delay, and previous bail application was withdrawn, deeming release improper.
Application for bail rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Rng IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.512 OF 2012
Rajendra Sakharam Mohandule .. Applicant
vs 1.The State of Maharashtra 2.P.I.Police Station, Junnar,Pune ..Respondents
Mr. Balwant Patole I.b Mr.Subhash Hulyalkar for Applicant Mr. J.P.Kharge APP for State
CORAM: A.M.THIPSAY, J DATE: 4 th May, 2012
P.C.
512.12
Application is rejected.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the application for bail in a charge of rape under section 376 IPC should be granted considering the matter was amicably settled and the previous bail application was withdrawn by the applican
Whether the delay in the trial caused by the applicant and the commencement of proceedings justify denying bail in a non-compoundable offence.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajendra Sakharam Mohandule
The State of Maharashtra
P.I.Police Station, Junnar,Pune
A.M.Thipsay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
