Allowed

Vinayak Kirachand Domale v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC28 Sept 2012BA/1338/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court granted bail to the applicant charged under Sections 366 and 376 IPC and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, ordering him to furnish bail bond and ensure stay away from prosecution witnesses.

What did the court decide?

Applicant released on bail with a bond of Rs. 25,000/- and one or more sureties in Rs. 25,000/-, subject to staying away from prosecution witnesses.

Vinayak Kirachand Domale Vs the State of Maharashtra — Caste Atrocities | Bombay HC (2012)

¶1

BA 1338-12.odt

¶2

Anand

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

 BAIL APPLICATION NO.1338 OF 2012

¶5

Vinayak Kirachand Domale.Applicant

¶6

 V/s.

¶7

The State of Maharashtra.Respondent

¶8

Mr.A.B.Tajane, Advocate, for the Applicant
Mr.Rajesh More, APP, for the Respondent - State

¶9

CORAM:R.C.CHAVAN, J.
DATE:28TH SEPTEMBER, 2012

¶10

P.C.

¶11

.Heard the learned counsel for the

¶12

respective parties.

¶13

2.This is an application for bail by a
person, who is arrested in connection with
C.R.No.224 of 2012 for the offences punishable
under Sections 366, 376 of the Indian Penal Code
& under Sections 3(1)(xii) & 3(2)(v) of the
Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention
of Atrocities Act), 1989 registered with
Lonikalbhor Police Station, Pune(Rural).

¶14

Page 1 of 3

¶15

BA 1338-12.odt

¶16

3.The first informant - victim was a

¶17

married woman, who had a dispute with her
husband and in fact, had been granted
maintenance by order dated 31st July, 2010 passed
by the learned Judicial Magistrate F. C., Daund,
District - Pune. She had also stated in her
report that she was married woman. She claimed
that between 2nd May, 2012 and 15th May, 2012,
the applicant took the victim at various places
and had intercourse with her promising that he
would marry her but ditched her afterwards.
Therefore, she gave a report.

¶18

4.Considering the nature of allegations

¶19

made, since investigation is complete and charge
sheet has already been filed, applicant's being
in custody pending trial may not be necessary.
Applicant be released on bail on his furnishing
P.R.Bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one or

¶20

more solvent sureties in the sum aggregating to
Rs.25,000/- till the trial is over. Apprehension
of the learned APP that the applicant would

¶21

Page 2 of 3

¶22

BA 1338-12.odt

¶23

tamper with prosecution evidence can be taken
care of by directing the applicant to
scrupulously keep himself away from the
prosecution witnesses.

¶24

5.Bail Application stands disposed of.

¶25

Page 3 of 3

Vinayak Kirachand Domale v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vinayak Kirachand Domale v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajesh Brijesh Verma Vs the State of Maharashtra

Shivpal Dinbandhu Singh Vs the State of Maharashtra

Ganesh Vasant Badal Vs the State of Maharashtra

Madhavi Ramesh Dudani and Anr. Vs the Commissioner of Police and Ors.

Sarwarlaram Bakruddin Khalappa Shaikh Vs the State of Maharashtra

Sunil Sambhaji Mane Vs the State of Maharashtra