The High Court disposed of Criminal Application No. 881 of 2012 as withdrawn upon the applicant's prayer. The court noted the accused's jail status warrants priority for the Sessions trial.
The application was disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
crap881.12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 881 OF 2012
Ambadas s/o Ashruba Shinde ...Applicant
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra,
through Ashti Police Station,
Tq. Partur, Dist.Jalna...Respondent
Shri V.M.Jaware, advocate for the applicant
Shri S.B.Pulkundwar, A.P.P. for respondent
CORAM : A.H.JOSHI, J.
DATED : 15.03.2012.
PER COURT :-
1.In the midst of hearing, learned Advocate prays
for permission to withdraw the application. He
expresses that in view that the accused is in jail the
trial of Sessions Case may be expedited.
2. Application is disposed as withdrawn.
2crap881.12
3. In the event, if the applicant prays for
expediting the Sessions Trial on the ground that the
accused is in jail, learned Sessions Judge would give
reasonable priority, on the ground that accused is in
jail.
dbm/crap881.12
Ambadas s/o Ashruba Shinde
The State of Maharashtra
A.H. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court