Single-judge order dismissing Criminal Applications 831 and 832 of 2010 for want of prosecution because neither the applicant nor the respondent appeared on the fixed hearing date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
( 1 ) Cri. Application Nos. 832 & 831 of 2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
District : Latur
Criminal Application No. 832 of 2010
(For condonation of delay) (In Criminal Application No. 831 of 2010) With
Criminal Application No. 831 of 2010
(Laxminarayan Finance & Investment Corporation Limited, Latur
Vs.
Sanjay s/o. Pundlikrao Pastapure)
Appearances : Mr. V.V. Tamke, Advocate, for the applicant [Absent].
Respondent (sole) served [Absent].
CORAM : SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.
DATE : 25TH SEPTEMBER 2012
COURT'S ORDER :
( 2 ) Cri. Application Nos. 832 & 831 of 2010
(SHRIHARI P. DAVARE) JUDGE
bgp/ka832etc
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Criminal Applications stand dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of parties on the posted date.
Laxminarayan Finance & Investment Corporation Limited
Sanjay s/o. Pundlikrao Pastapure
Shrihari P. Dave
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
