The High Court at Aurangabad dismissed the criminal application as the applicant failed to appear on the hearing date. The court refused the application
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
crap803.12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 803 OF 2012
Sunil @ Dada s/o Narayan Nath...Applicant
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & anr....Respondents
Shri N.N.Tungar, advocate for the applicant
Shri S.B.Pulkundwar, A.P.P. for respondents
CORAM : A.H.JOSHI, J.
DATED : 13.03.2012.
PER COURT:-
1.The applicant was directed to remain present
before the court on 5th March, 2012. On that date,
learned advocate for the applicant had prayed for
postponement on the ground that applicant�s father had
died on 23rd February, 2012.
2.Learned advocate Shri Tungar informs the court
that the applicant has not arrived.
3.In view that applicant has failed to appear,
application is dismissed.
2crap803.12
4.At this stage, learned advocate for the applicant
states that he would choose to withdraw the application
in stead of facing order of dismissal.
5. Request for withdrawal is refused.
dbm/crap803.12
Sunil @ Dada s/o Narayan Nath
The State of Maharashtra
Respondent No. 2
A.H. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court