Abhijeet Chandrashekhar Poopal v. the State of Mah and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 602 OF 2012 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 234 OF 2007
| Office Notes, |
Off | ice | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Memoranda of | Cora |
m, |
|
| appearances, orders or directio Registrar’s orders |
Cou ns a |
rt’s nd |
Court’s or Judge’s orders |
| Mr. N.B. Narwade, Advocate for applicant. Mr. S.D. Kaldate, A.P.P. for State. Mr. S.B. Narwade i/b. Mr. R.B. Narwade, Advocate for respondent No. 2. |
|||
| CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL & T. V. NALAWADE, JJ. DATED : 26th March, 2012. |
|||
| PER COURT : | |||
| 1. Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, | |||
| the delay in filing the restoration application is | |||
| condoned. The Criminal Application is disposed of. | |||
| [ T. V. NALAWADE, J.] [ NARESH H. PATIL, J.] ssc/ |
Mr. N.B. Narwade
State
NARESH H. PATIL
T. V. NALAWADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court