The court dismissed the criminal application for discharge, holding that an equally efficacious remedy was available to the applicant to seek the same from the trial court.
The present application stood dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
appln4819.10
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4819 OF 2010
Office Notes, Office |_________________________________________________________________________________
Memoranda of Coram, |
appearances, Court's |
orders or | Court's or Judge's Orders
directions and |
Registrar's orders |
_________________________________________________________________________________
Mr. S.S. Kazi, advocate for the applicant.
Mr. S.B. Pulkundwar, APP for the respondent
no.1/State.
Mr. R.R. Mantri, advocate for the respondent
no.2.
.....
CORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE, J.
Date : 16th April, 2012.
P.C. :
The applicant is entitled to seek
discharge from the trial Court in Crime
No.111 of 2010 registered with Raver
Police Station, Dist. Jalgaon. In view of
this, as equally efficacious remedy is
available to the applicant, the present
application stands dismissed.
( A.V. NIRGUDE, J. )
sga/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to seek discharge from the trial court when an equally efficacious remedy is available.
applicant
State
respondent no.2
A.V. NIRGUDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court