Allowed
Shankarrao Vithalrao Raut v. Vijay Eknath Karale and Anr.
Bombay HCAPPLN/3742/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3742 OF 2012 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3340 OF 2012
Shankarrao Vithalrao Raut
..Applicant
Versus
Vijay s/o Eknath Karale and ors.
..Respondents
Mr N.B.Narwade, Advocate for applicant Mr R.N.Dhorde, Senior Counsel i/b Mr N.V.Gaware, Advocate for respondent No. 1
Mr R.P.Phatke, A.P.P. for respondent No.2
CORAM : M.T. JOSHI, J.
DATE : 4th October 2012
PER COURT
Heard.
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed.
( M.T. JOSHI, J. )
(vvr/3742.12criappln)
Shankarrao Vithalrao Raut
Vijay s/o Eknath Karale and ors.
M.T. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court