Disposed
Sachin Vitthal Jagdale v. the State of Mah
Bombay HCAPPLN/3688/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRIAP-3688.12
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3688 OF 2012
Sachin Vitthal Jagdale Applicant vs The State of Maharashtra Respondent ---Shri Ramesh V. Naiknavare, Advocate for applicant Shri R.P. Phatke, A.P.P. for the Respondent - State.
CORAM : M. T. JOSHI, J. DATE : 27TH SEPTEMBER, 2012
P. C.
has become infructuous due to arrest of the accused.
(M.T. JOSHI, J.)
pnd/CRIAP-3688.12
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Procedure CodeReferred¶7
P. C.
Sachin Vitthal Jagdale
The State of Maharashtra
M. T. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court