Single judge order condoning a delay of over 1233 days in filing a criminal revision and disposing of the application without admitting what order was sought.
Delay in filing criminal revision application condoned; application disposed without hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
359.2012 Cri.Appln.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 359 OF 2012
Syed Bashir S/o Syed Maheboob
APPLICANT
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra
RESPONDENT
Shri M.V. Ghatge, Advocate holding for Shri B.N. Gadegaonkar, Advocate for applicant Shri S.N. Kendre, A.P.P. for respondent / State.
CORAM : U.D. SALVI, J.
DATED : 15th March, 2012.
PER COURT :
2
359.2012 Cri.Appln.
pleaded for condonation of delay has remain un-controverted. Delay is condoned. List the Criminal Revision Application for admission in due course. Criminal Application No. 359/2012 stands disposed off accordingly.
( U.D. SALVI, J. )
SDM* MARCH-2012
Syed Bashir S/o Syed Maheboob
The State of Maharashtra
U.D. Salvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
