This court disposed of a criminal revision application. The delay in filing was condoned based on uncontroverted ignorance of the impugned order, and no substantive issues were addressed.
no substantive relief was granted; application disposed off due to condoned delay.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.311 OF 2012 IN
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION STAMP NO.13 OF 2012
(Anil s/o Sonyabapu Todmal Vs. Shri Dnyandeo s/o Nana Thevarkar & anr.)
Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Court's or Judge's orders Registrar's orders
Shri Y.S. Choudhari, Advocate for applicant Shri R.R. Karpe, Advocate for respondent No.1. Shri S.N. Kendre, A.P.P. for respondent No.2
CORAM : U.D. SALVI, J.
DATED : 20th March, 2012.
order perhaps caused the delay of 67 days in preferring Criminal Revision Application. This fact has remained uncontroverted. Delay is condoned. Criminal Application No.311/2012 stands disposed off accordingly.
( U.D. SALVI, J. )
fmp/cri311.12
Anil s/o Sonyabapu Todmal
Shri Dnyandeo s/o Nana Thevarkar
U.D. Salvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
