The high court allowed the applicants to withdraw the pending criminal applications and disposed of them. It directed the session judge to expedite the trial of the undertrial prisoners to conclude it as early as possible.
Applications withdrawn and disposed; Sessions Judge directed to expedite trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
{1}
Cri. Application No.3061/2012
drp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3061 OF 2012
WITH
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3058 OF 2012
WITH
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3059 OF 2012
Mahadeo Punjaram Bargaje
APPLICANT
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & others
RESPONDENTS
Mr.P.R.Katneshwarkar h/f Mr.S.R.Andhale, Advocate for applicant Mr.P.P.More, APP for respondent State Mr.A.D.Aghav, Advocate for respondents
[CORAM : M.T.JOSHI, J.]
DATE: 10th October 2012
PER COURT:
applicants wishes to withdraw all these applications, however, the
learned Sessions Judge may be directed to expedite the hearing
and conclude the trial as early as possible.
{2} Cri. Application No.3061/2012
applications. Accordingly, all the applications stand disposed of. Learned Sessions Judge is directed to expedite the hearing of the
trial keeping in view the pendency of other matters of the under
trial prisoners pending before him.
[M.T.JOSHI, J.]
drp/criapln3061-12
Mahadeo Punjaram Bargaje
The State of Maharashtra
M.T JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
