This order dismisses Criminal Applications challenging the grant of interim anticipatory bail by the Sessions Court in rape and termination of pregnancy cases, holding that the facts did not warrant interference.
The criminal applications were dismissed, upholding the Sessions Court's order confirming interim anticipatory bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
crap228.12
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 228 OF 2012 [The State of Maharashtra vs Shahdeo Kisan Kirtane] AND
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 232 OF 2012 [The State of Maharashtra vs Dattu Bapurao Raut]
_________________________________________________________________________________
Office Notes, Office |
Memoranda of Coram, |
appearances, Court's | Court’s or Judge’s orders
orders or |
directions and |
Registrar's orders |
Shri R.P.Phatke, A.P.P. for applicant/State in both Applications
CORAM : A.H.JOSHI, J.
DATED : 02.02.2012.
PER COURT:-
crap228.12
2
dbm/crap228.12
(A.H.JOSHI, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the Sessions Court confirming interim anticipatory bail in cases arising from consented sexual intercourse and termination of pregnancy.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Shahdeo Kisan Kirtane
Dattu Bapurao Raut
A.H.JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court