In Criminal Application No. 9/2012 before the Nagpur Bench, the High Court dismissed the application for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
28.09.apl.9.12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 9/2012
(Niraj Prakashchand Kochar and others vs.Asmita Niraj Kochar )
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders
None for the applicants
CORAM : M.L. TAHALIYANI, J. DATED : 28th September, 2012.
None for the applicants.
Mr.V.R.Choudhari, learned counsel for
respondent - Asmita is present.
Dismissed for want of prosecution.
JUDGE
sahare
Niraj Prakashchand Kochar and others
Asmita Niraj Kochar
M.L. Tahaliyani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court