Criminal application was dismissed because the applicant's counsel stated the application was misconceived and did not want to press it, resulting in withdrawal and dismissal.
null
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cr.appln.1961/11 in Cr.appln.2971/04
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1961/2011 IN
CRIMIINAL APPLICATION NO.2971/2004
Syed Faisal Pasha Syed Farook Pasha.
...Applicant..
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & others. ...Respondents... .....
Shri S.M. Kulkarni, Advocate for applicant.
Shri S.K. Kadam, APP for respondent no.1 - State.
Shri Omgashad B. Boinwad, Advocate h/f Shri T.W. Pathan, Advocate for respondent no.2.
CORAM: A.H. JOSHI &
U.D. SALVI, JJ.
DATE: 12.09.2012
ORDER :
The learned Advocate for the applicant states that this application is
misconceived and he does not want to press and be dismissed as
withdrawn. The application is, therefore, dismissed accordingly.
(U.D. SALVI, J.) (A.H. JOSHI, J)
ndk/cr1291229
Syed Faisal Pasha Syed Farook Pasha
The State of Maharashtra
A.H. JOSHI
U.D. SALVI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court