The State of Mah v. Uttam Karbhari Wagh
Case brief
What is this about?
No. 1857/12 1 IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cri. Appln. No. 1857/12
1
IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1857 OF 2012
The State of Maharashtra ....Applicant.
Versus
Uttam Karbhari Wagh ....Respondent.
Mr. R.P. Phatke, A.P.P. for applicant. Mr. Amol S. Gandhi, Advocate for original complainant.
Mr. S.G. Kawade h/f. Mr. S.J. Salunke, Advocate for respondent.
CORAM : T. V. NALAWADE, J. DATED : 20th June, 2012.
ORAL ORDER :
Cri. Appln. No. 1857/12
2
no circumstance brought to the notice of the Sessions Court to the effect that the respondent was likely to create any trouble in the village, the condition came to be cancelled. Even in the present application, there is no record like complaint received from the persons of opposite side against the respondent.
[ T. V. NALAWADE, J. ]
ssc/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to re-impose the condition that prevented the respondent from entering his village after the earlier condition was cancelled by the Sessions Court.
State of Maharashtra
Uttam Karbhari Wagh
T. V. Nalawade
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court