The applicant sought leave to withdraw Criminal Application No. 116 of 2012. The High Court granted leave, and the application was disposed of as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw the application is granted; the application is disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
Criminal Application No.116 of 2012
(Govindprasad Shrigopalji Mundada v. The State & Ors.)
OfficeNotes,Office Court's or Judge's orders
MemorandaofCoram,
appearances,Court's CORAM : A.H. JOSHI, J.
orders or directions and
Registrar's orders
Mr. Sk Hakkani Mohd. Hussain, Advocate for
the applicant
Mr. S.B. Pulkundwar, APP for the respondent
No.1/ State
Mr. S.E. Siddiqui, Adv. for respondent Nos.
2 & 3
1.After completion of hearing, learned
Advocate for the applicant prays to leave to
withdraw the application.
2.Leave is granted.
3.This application is disposed of as
withdrawn.
( A. H. JOSHI, J. )
Date : 23/02/2012
SRM/
Govindprasad Shrigopalji Mundada
The State
Ors.
A.H. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court