The High Court rejected a bail application filed by an individual caught on the spot by a witness after committing dacoity. The Court held that evidence of the apprehension at the spot made out no case for bail, deferring the issue of alleged omissions to the appeal stage.
Application rejected; bail not granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 APPA 963 OF 2011
vks
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.963 OF 2011
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.955 OF 2011
Sayyad Musadik Wahiuddin Kadri @ Musadik Moiddik Kadri .. Applicant -versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent.
Mr. Keshav Chavan, for the applicant.
Mr. R. M. Gadhavi, APP for the Respondent State.
CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: 4th January, 2012
P.C.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to an applicant caught red-handed committing dacoity despite counsel alleging an omission in the witness statement.
Sayyad Musadik Wahiuddin Kadri @ Musadik Moiddik Kadri
The State of Maharashtra
R.C. Chavan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
