The High Court rejected the bail application arguing the gravity of the offence precludes interim bail pending the final appeal hearing, and expedited the criminal appeal for next board order.
Bail application rejected; appeal expedites for final hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S
1 appa793.12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.793 OF 2012 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.464 OF 2012
Revansidha @ Bapu Gursiddhappa Loni .. Applicant. Vs. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent.
Mr.Manoj M.Mohite for the applicant. Mr.H.J.Dedhia APP for the State.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE & P. D. KODE, JJ.
DATED : 27TH NOVEMBER, 2012
P.C.
2 appa793.12
evidence of those two witnesses and submitted that no reliance can be placed on said evidence. It is submitted that statements made by these witnesses are improvements. He further submitted that apart from this evidence there is no other material on record to connect the applicant with the offence. He submitted that so far as conspiracy is concerned, the findings has been recorded by the trial Court under section 120B that there is no material on the basis of which such findings could have been recorded by the trial Court. In our view taking into consideration gravity of the offence and fact that the applicant has also been convicted for the offence punishable under section 120B at this stage it would not be possible to grant bail to the applicant since all points which are urged by learned counsel for the applicant will have to be taken into consideration at the time of final hearing of the appeal. No case is made out for grant of bail. The application for bail is rejected.
(P. D. KODE, J.)
(V. M. KANADE, J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail can be granted to the appellant during pendency of appeal.
Whether the appeal should be placed on final hearing board.
Revansidha @ Bapu Gursiddhappa Loni
The State of Maharashtra
V. M. Kanade
P. D. Kode
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
