Allowed

Manohar S/O Jangluji Surjuse (in Central Prison) v. the State of Mah. Thr. P.S.O.

Bombay HC27 Sept 2012APPA/785/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed a criminal application to condone a delay of 57 days in filing an appeal against conviction and directed registry registration of the appeal. The appeal was subsequently admitted for hearing upon the respondent's acceptance.

What did the court decide?

Delay of 57 days condoned; Appeal registered and admitted for hearing.

Manohar S/O Jangluji Surjuse (in Central Prison) Vs… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Bombay HC (2012)

¶1

27.9APPA785.12

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

¶4

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 785/12 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2012 Manohar Jangluji Surjuse .vs. The State of Maharashtra

¶5

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

¶6

Mr. F.N. Haidari, Advocate for applicant/appellant. Mrs. N.R. Tripathi, A.P.P. for respondent.

¶7

CORAM : P.V. HARDAS & A.P. BHANGALE, JJ.

¶8

DATED : SEPTEMBER 27, 2012.

¶9

By this application, the applicant/accused seeks condonation of delay of 57 days in filing an appeal challenging his conviction.

¶10

We have heard Ms. Haidari, learned Counsel for the applicant and learned A.P.P. for the respondent and for the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed and the delay is condoned.

¶11

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2012 :

¶12

(Manohar Jangluji Surjuse .vs. The State of Maharashtra)

¶13

In the light of the fact that we have condoned the delay in filing of this appeal, we direct the Registry to register this appeal.

¶14

27.9APPA785.12

¶15

¶16

This appeal is heard for admission at the request of learned Counsel for the appellant.

¶17

Heard Ms. Haidari, learned Counsel for the appellant. Admit.

¶18

Learned A.P.P. accepts notice of admission of appeal

¶19

on behalf of respondent.

¶20

Judge Judge

¶21

Manohar S/O Jangluji Surjuse (in Central Prison) v. the State of Mah. Thr. P.S.O.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manohar S/O Jangluji Surjuse (in Central Prison) v. the State of Mah. Thr. P.S.O.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr Shyamrao S/O Ghamaji Bade and Others Vs State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary Ministry of Home Affairs Mantralaya, Mumbai and Others

Pramod S/O Balkrishna Vaidya (in Jail) Vs State of Mah. Thr. P.S.O. Narkhed P.S.

Sanjay S/O Purushottam Narkhede (in Jail) Vs State of Mah. Thr. P.S.O., Pratap Nagar Police Station

Mohammad Wasim Md. Imam Bhiwaniwale Vs the State of Maharashtra through Superintendent of Prison Amravati

Pravin S/O Manohar Dhabekar and Others Vs State of Maharashtra through Pso Ps Hudkeshwar

Mrs Pushpa W/O Damodharrao Navghare and Another Vs Mrs Sharda W/O Prashant Raut and Another