Dismissed

Nikhil S/O Vasant Ingole v. the State of Mah. Thr. Its Police Station Officer

Bombay HC19 Jul 2012APPA/408/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Bench dismissed multiple Criminal Applications filed by appellants in a Sessions trial as withdrawn, permitting the applicants to furnish private paper-books within six weeks before the Registry lists the appeals for final hearing.

What did the court decide?

Applications dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file private paper-books within six weeks; appeals listed for final hearing thereafter.

Nikhil S/O Vasant Ingole Vs the State of Mah. Thr… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Bombay HC (2012)

¶1

1/2

¶2

19.07.appa.408.12

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

¶4

CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPA) NO. 408 /2012 IN CRI.APPEAL NO. 217/2012 (Nikhil Vasant Ingole vs. State) & CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPA) NO.529/2012 IN CRI.APPEAL NO. 207/2012( Washim @ Bhurya vs. State) & CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPA).................. IN CRI.APPEAL NO......../2012 & CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPA) ........ IN CRI.APPEAL NO........./2012

¶5

.................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders

¶6

S/Shri A.S.Mardikar/V.M. Deshpande and S.D. Chande, Adv. for applicants in respective Applications

¶7

Ms. Tripathi and Mr R.S. Nayak, APP for respondent-State

¶8

CORAM : P.V.HARDAS & M.L.TAHALIYANI, JJ. DATED : 19^th July, 2012.

¶9

Criminal Application No.408/2012 has been filed by original accused no.1 in Sessions Trial No.51/2009 and those unregistered Applications have been filed by original accused nos.2 and 3 in Sessions Trial No.51/2009; while Criminal Application No.529 /2012 has been filed by the sole accused.

¶10

After arguing those Applications at length when the Court was about to dictate the order dismissing the Applications on merit, the learned counsel for the applicants urged before the Court that the applicants may be permitted to withdraw these Applications and seek liberty to file private

2/2

19.07.appa.408.12

paper-books.

We accordingly dismiss these Applications as withdrawn, permitting the applicants/appellants to furnish private paper-books within six weeks from today. We direct the Registry to list the Appeals for final hearing as soon as the paper books have been filed.

¶15

JUDGEJUDGE

¶16

sahare

Nikhil S/O Vasant Ingole v. the State of Mah. Thr. Its Police Station Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nikhil S/O Vasant Ingole v. the State of Mah. Thr. Its Police Station Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Siddharth S/O Sitaramji Shinde Vs the State of Maharashtra through Pso Ps Narkhed Distt Nagpur

Gokuldas Rambhau Rangari, C/3322 Vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary Home Deptt Mantralaya, Mumbai and Another

Wasudeo Mahadev Tejne, C/6773 Vs Dig Prisons (East) Nagpur and Another

Rajendra Kasana Chavhan Vs the State of Mah. Thr. Police Inspector, P.S. Pusad (City)

Babu S/O Malke Prajapati Vs Police Station Officer Police Station Hudkeshwar, Nagpur and Others

Sk Ejaz @ Ijju Sk Sayeed Vs State of Maharashtra through Pso Ps Washim