The appeal against a temporary injunction order in a copyright dispute was rendered infructuous as the film was already released for exhibition and broadcasting before the decision could be made on merits.
The Notice of Motion (Lodging) no.1259 of 2012 stood disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 of 2 APP(L).574.2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL (LODGING) NO.574 OF 2012 IN
NOTICE OF MOTION (LODGING) NO.1259 OF 2012 IN SUIT (LODGING) NO.897 OF 2012 WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION (LODGING) NO.2431 OF 2012
Shashi Pankaj Madhukar @ Pankaj Kumar versus
Shirish Kunder and others
Appellant
Respondents
Mr.U.P.Warunjikar with Mr.Vishnu Chavan i/by Kulkarni & Associates for Appellant.
Mr.Gaurav Joshi with Mr.Vivek Shetty and Mr.Rishikesh soni i/by DSK Legal for Respondents 2 to 4.
Ms.Pooja Kshirsagar i/by I.C. Legal for Respondent no.3.
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD AND A.A.SAYED, JJ.
DATE : 31 August 2012
PC :
2 of 2 APP(L).574.2012
counsel appearing on behalf of the First, Second and Fourth Respondents that the film has already been released for exhibition and broadcasting and that as a matter of fact the first show today as advertised was at 9.00 a.m..
(DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.)
(A.A.SAYED, J.)
MST
Shashi Pankaj Madhukar @ Pankaj Kumar
Shirish Kunder and others
Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud
A.A. Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
