The High Court allowed the applicant to withdraw Criminal Applications No.97 and 98 of 2012. The court disposed of the applications as withdrawn, directing the trial court to consider them on merits later.
Leave to withdraw criminal applications allowed and applications disposed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1APL 97-12.odt
Anand
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.97 OF 2012 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.98 OF 2012
Pratap Pedenekar .Applicant
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & anr..Respondents
Mr.RajendraRathodi/b.Mr.D.A.Siddiqui,
Advocate, for the Applicant in both applns.
Mr.A.R.Patil, APP, for Respondent No.1 - State
Mr.Ajay Rai, Advocate, for Respondent No.2
CORAM:R.C.CHAVAN, J.
DATE:22ND MARCH, 2012
P.C.
.Heard the learned counsel for the
respective parties.
2.The learned counsel for the applicant
seeks leave to withdraw Criminal Applications.
Criminal Applications are allowed to be
withdrawn. Criminal Applications are disposed
of as withdrawn. The learned trial magistrate
would without being prejudiced by what has been
2APL 97-12.odt
observed in his order or order of the Sessions
Court deal with the matter on merits at the
trial when he finally hears arguments about
admissibility of documents.
Pratap Pedenekar
The State of Maharashtra
R.C.CHAVAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court