The applicant contended that the underlying matter would be settled amicably. Consequently, the High Court disposed of the Criminal Application as not pressed, vacating any interim order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 apl284.12.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
CRIMINAL APPLICATION(APL) NO.284 OF 2012
(MANOJ RAMDASJI DHALE..VS.. SATISH BALRAMJI SHENDE.)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
CORAM : M.L.TAHALIYANI, J. DATED : OCTOBER 18, 2012.
Heard Mr.S.A.Sainis, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr.Ananta Ramteke, learned counsel for the respondent.
It is submitted on behalf of the applicant that the matter is likely to be settled amicably before the trial Court, this application is, therefore, not pressed.
The application is disposed of as not pressed. Interim order, if any, shall stand vacated.
JUDGE
RRaut..
Manoj Ramdasji Dhale
Satish Balramji Shende
M.L. Tahaliyani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
