Criminal application challenging proceedings initiated under Section 145 CrPC was dismissed as the application was not diligently attended by the applicant's counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
apl130-12.sxw
1/1
Pvr
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.130 OF 2012
Rajendra Vishwanath Kanhere. …Applicant. versus 1.Sapna Rajehswar Mishra & Ors. ...Respondents --None for Applicant. Ms.Alpa T.Javeri, APP for State. --- CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATED : 3rd December, 2012 P.C. :
The proceedings initiated under Section 145 of Cr.P.C. dated 4.1.2012 are questioned. The Counsel called, absent. The matter is not diligently attended. Criminal application is dismissed.
(K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajendra Vishwanath Kanhere
Sapna Rajeshwar Mishra & Ors.
K.U. Chandiwala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
