Partly allowed

Prakash Namdeo Bhalerao v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC3 Apr 2012APEAL/199/2001

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an appeal against conviction for dowry harassment and abetment of suicide, the High Court acquited the appellant of Section 306 IPC charges due to lack of evidence regarding instigation, while upholding the conviction under Section 498A IPC for cruelty.

What did the court decide?

Conviction for abetment of suicide set aside; conviction for cruelty under Section 498A IPC upheld; sentence for Section 306 acquity

Prakash Namdeo Bhalerao Vs the State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2012)

¶1

apl199.01

¶2

-1-

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 199 OF 2001

¶5

Prakash s/o Namdeo Bhalerao, Age 45 years, Occ. Labour, R/o. Kandari Plot, Bhusawal, Tq. Bhusawal, District Jalgoan ...Appellant

¶6

Versus The State of Maharashtra (Copy to be served on Public Prosecutor, High Court Bench at Aurangabad) ...Respondent

¶7

Mr. S.W. Munde, advocate for the appellant Mr. S.N. Kendre, APP for respondent-State .....

¶8

CORAM : SMT. S.S. JADHAV, J. DATED : 3RD APRIL, 2012

¶9

JUDGMENT :-

¶10

The appellant herein, who is the original accused in Sessions Case no. 192 of 1997, has been convicted by the IInd Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon for the offence punishable under section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and is sentenced to suffer R.I. for three years and to pay a fine of ` 100/- in default S.I. for 5 days. He is further convicted for the offence punishable under section 306 of the Indian Penal Code and is sentenced to suffer R.I. for 5 years and to

¶11

apl199.01 -2-

¶12

pay a fine of ` 200/- in default S.I. for 15 days, by the judgment and order dated 25.4.2001. Aggrieved thereby, the appellant has approached this Court by filing the instant Appeal.

¶13

Such of the facts, which are necessary for the decision of this appeal, are as follows:-

¶14

The appellant was married to Kalpana 14 years prior to the alleged incident. The couple was blessed with two sons viz. Pravin and Vijay. The case rests upon the dying declaration of Kalpana. On 2.9.1997, Kalpana was admitted in the Municipal Hospital, Bhusawal, as she had sustained burn injuries. The Medical Officer had given information to the Officer of city police station, Bhusawal about admission of the said patent. Pursuant to the said intimation, P.W.3 Narayan Suryawanshi, who was attached to city police station had been to the hospital to record the statement of injured. He had obtained the opinion of the Medical Officer in respect of fitness of the patient to give the statement. P.W.3 Narayan Suryawanshi then recorded the statement of Kalpana. Kalpana had disclosed him that her husband used to illtreat her and occasionally beat her under the influence of alcohol. He suspected her chastity and hence on 2.9.1997, when she was fed up with the illtreatment, a quarrel had ensued between the couple. Her husband had abused her inside the

¶15

apl199.01 -3-

¶16

house and then assaulted her just outside the house. She was annoyed and therefore, threatened him that she would immolate herself. She further disclosed that at that juncture her husband told her that she may immolate herself and handed over a matchstick box to her. She went inside the house, lit the stove and then threw the pallu of her sari on the said stove. The sari caught fire and hence she sustained burn injuries. She specifically stated that her husband had not set her ablaze but since he suspected her chastity and assaulted her, she lit the stove and set herself ablaze. She was admitted in the hospital by her mother-in-law Anusayabai and a boy, residing in the neighbourhood. On the basis of the said statement, crime no.80 of 1997 was registered with Bhusawal City Police Station against the accused for the offences punishable under section 498A, 323, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The investigation was set in motion. The accused was arrested on 3.9.1997. Kalpana had succumbed to the burn injuries on 3.9.1997.

¶17

On completion of investigation, the charge sheet was filed against the accused on 15.10.1997. The case was committed to the Court of Sessions and registered as Sessions Case no. 192 of 1997.

¶18

During the course of trial, the prosecution has examined in all 5 witnesses to bring home the guilt of the accused. After completion of trial, the appellant/accused has been convicted and sentenced, as

apl199.01

-4-

aforesaid.

I have heard learned Advocate for the appellant and the learned A.P.P. for the respondent-State. With the assistance of the learned Advocates, I have perused the impugned judgment and the evidence on record.

¶23

P.W. 1 Raju Gadhe, is the brother of the deceased Kalpana. He has not supported the prosecution and hence has been declared hostile. Similarly, P.W. 2 Chandrabhagabai Chandu Gadhe is the mother of deceased and she also has not supported the case of the prosecution and has been declared hostile.

¶24

P.W. 3 Narayan Kautik Suryawanshi has recorded the statement

¶25

of Kalpana at Municipal Hospital, Bhusawal. On the basis of the said statement, offence has been registered against the appellant. The said statement of Kalpana is at Exhibit 19. P.W. 3 has proved the contents of said dying declaration. According to P.W.3 Narayan, on 3.9.1997, he was attached to City Police Station, Bhusawal, when the then Thane Amaldar deputed him to record the statement of Kalpana. He has further deposed that he first met Dr. Chhaya Buti, who examined the patient and informed him that the patient was conscious to give the statement. He further deposed that Kalpana disclosed him

¶26

apl199.01 -5-

¶27

that her husband used to illtreat and beat her under the influence of alcohol. He suspected her chastity and since she had disclosed that she would immolate herself, her husband reacted by suggesting that she may do so. Hence, she lit the stove and set herself ablaze. He had obtained her thumb mark on the said statement and had attested the same. He has further clarified that when he was recording her statement, no relative of Kalpana was present there. In the crossexamination of this witness, there is an admission that he could not assign any reason as to why the thumb mark of Kalpana was not attested by him. In the cross-examination, P.W. 3 has also disclosed that Kalpana was under treatment and was complaining of pains due to burns. She was totally burnt. Besides that, the recording of dying declaration is not seriously challenged by the defence.

¶28

P.W. 3 has specifically admitted in his cross-examination that

¶29

Kalpana was totally burnt. On perusal of the post-mortem note, it appears that Kalpana had sustained 98% burn injuries. The burns were 2nd to 4th degree burns. On the right and left arms, there was 18% burns.

¶30

Learned counsel for the appellant has pointed out that the

¶31

thumb impression at Exhibit 19 reveals clear curves and rages. That thumb impression is not attested by the scriber i.e. P.W. 3 and hence,

¶32

apl199.01 -6-

¶33

it is doubtful, as to whether the thumb impression was that of deceased Kalpana. The said submission is substantiated, as it is found that thumb impression is clearly marked and has not been attested by P.W. 3.

¶34

P.W.4 Dr. Chhaya Buti was working as a Medical Officer in the Municipal Hospital at Bhusawal. On 2.9.1997, at about 9.00 p.m. Kalpana was admitted in the hospital with 100% burns. According to P.W.4 Dr. Buti, at the request of the Police Officer, she examined Kalpana at 12.30 a.m. and found her conscious to speak. She had deposed that the statement of Kalpana was recorded in her presence. She has also deposed about the contents of the statement, as were heard by her. P.W.4 has reduced the medical case papers of Kalpana. On perusal of the case papers, which are at Exh.23, it is found that the patient was admitted at about 8.15 p.m. on 2.9.1997. The patient was admitted by her husband. However, in the statement of Kalpana, it is revealed that the wife of her elder brother-in-law and neighbour had admitted her in the hospital. Hence, that part of the statement ought to have been disbelieved.

¶35

P.W.4 has deposed before the Court that Kalpana was conscious till 12.20 a.m. and thereafter had succumbed to the burn injuries. The condition of the patient was serious and information

¶36

apl199.01 -7-

¶37

regarding general power of patient was given to the relatives of the injured. The said dying declaration was recorded in the intervening night of 2.9.1997 and 3.9.1997. P.W.4 has specifically stated that Kalpana was conscious till 12.20 a.m. on 3.9.1997. This has to be read in consonance with the cross examination of P.W.3 who has deposed before the Court that he started recording the statement of Kalpana on 3.9.1997 at 00.30 hours. It therefore, appears that Kalpana may not have been conscious at 12.30 midnight of 2.9.1997 and 3.9.1997. At the same time, the medical case papers would show that at 2.00 a.m. on 3.9.1997 as well as 4.00 a.m., general condition of the patient was poor. Hence, the record do not corroborate or substantiate the evidence.

¶38

P.W.5 Shailendra Shinde is the Investigating Officer. He has proved the omission and contradictions in the evidence of P.W.1 and P.W.2.

¶39

One thing is clear that after 14 years of the marriage Kalpana was frustrated and fed up with the illtreatment meted out to her over a passage of time and therefore, she must have committed suicide. The mere words of the accused asking her to set herself ablaze was only

¶40

the reaction to the statement of Kalpana that she would immolate herself. The utterance of words, by way of reaction would not amount

¶41

apl199.01 -8-

¶42

to abetment to commit suicide. Section 107 of I.P.C. defines abetment

¶43

as " a person abets the doing of a thing, if he firstly instigates any person to do that thing or, secondly, engages with one or more other person or persons in any conspiracy for the doing of that thing, if an act or illegal omission takes place in pursuance of that conspiracy, and in order to the doing of that thing; or thirdly, intentionally aids, by any act or illegal omission, the doing of that thing ."

¶44

In the present case, there is no evidence to substantiate that accused had either abetted, instigated or facilitated the commission of suicide of his wife. The accused may not have even intended that she should be eliminated nor have the knowledge that she may take his words as a command. In fact, it appears that Kalpana, on her own accord had demonstrated her intention to commit suicide and in reaction, the accused had only said that she may have her own way. Therefore, the accused-appellant cannot be held liable for the offence punishable under section 306 of I.P.C.

¶45

It however, appears that the accused-appellant would be liable for the offence punishable under Section 498A of I.P.C. The evidence on record would go to show that there was harassment and illtreatment meted out to her, over a passage of time. That she was frustrated, fed up and could not take any more and therefore, she

¶46

apl199.01

¶47

-9-

¶48

would prefer to end her life.

¶49

Under Section 498A of IPC, cruelty means , - " Any willful conduct which is of such a nature as is likely to drive the woman to commit suicide or to cause grave injury or danger to life, limb or health (whether mental or physical) of the woman."

¶50

It is clear that cruelty, as defined under Section 498A of I.P.C., was meted out to to Kalpana. Hence, the appellant-accused is liable to be convicted for the offence punishable under Section 498A of I.P.C.

¶51

In the result, the Appeal is partly allowed. The appellantaccused has undergone the sentence for 120 days in the jail. The said sentence would be sufficient to meet the ends of justice and hence, the appellant is sentenced to suffer the period of imprisonment, already undergone. The sentence in respect of the fine amount is maintained. The bail bonds stand cancelled.

¶52

Prakash Namdeo Bhalerao v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prakash Namdeo Bhalerao v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dada Bhimrao Sonawane Vs the State of Maharashtra

Vasant Laxman Bhagwat Vs the State of Maharashtra

Atmaram Savaji Rathod Vs the State of Maharashtra

Raghunath Laxmanrao Karhad Vs State of Maha.

Sukhadeo Shamrao Ghorpade Vs the State of Maharashtra

Krishna Sudam Shinde Vs the State of Maharashtra