Sunil Laxman Lokhande v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application was dismissed after the applicant withdrew it upon being advised that they were not entitled to relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
sjs
ABA-997.2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE – CRIMINAL
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.997 OF 2012
Sunil Laxman Lokhande.... Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra.... Respondent
Shri Amit A. Karande for the Applicant.
Ms A.T. Javeri, APP, for the State.
CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J.
DATED: OCTOBER 17, 2012
P.C:
On being indicated that the applicant
is not entitled to anticipatory bail, the
learned counsel for the applicant seeks leave
to withdraw the application. The application is
dismissed as withdrawn.
Sunil Laxman Lokhande
The State of Maharashtra
R.C. CHAVAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court