The applicant was found possessing unlicensed liquor, an offence under the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949. He fled the scene and is a habitual offender. The Court rejected the plea for anticipatory bail and disposed of the application accordingly.
No relief granted; the plea for anticipatory bail was rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 aba381.12.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (ABA) NO.381 OF 2012
(Shrichand s/o Mohanlal Setiya ..vs.. State of Maharashtra, through PSO, PS Bramhapuri, District Chandrapur)
CORAM : M.L.TAHALIYANI, J. DATED : 09-10-2012.
Application stands disposed of accordingly.
JUDGE
pma
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the applicant in a case of possession of liquor without licence under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shrichand s/o Mohanlal Setiya
State of Maharashtra
M.L.TAHALIYANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
