Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Mozam Ali Vs Chandrashekhar P. Shelar — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2012)

Home
Bombay HC
2012
Mozam Ali Vs Chandrashekhar P. ShelarMozam Ali v. Chandrashekhar P. Shelar

Disposed

Mozam Ali v. Chandrashekhar P. Shelar

Bombay HC26 Mar 2012S/574/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Suit disposed of based on signed terms of consent agreed by both parties and their advocates. Undertakings accepted without elaboration.

What did the court decide?

Suit disposed of in terms of consent terms signed by parties and their advocates.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

1 -

37.s.574.12

skt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

SUIT NO. 574 OF 2012

Mir Mozam Ali ..Plaintiff

-Versus-

Chandrashekhar Pandurang Shelar ..Defendant

Mr.Rakesh K. Agarwal for the Plaintiff.

Mr. Pawan Kumar Mishra for the Defendant.

CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 26^TH MARCH 2012.

P.C.

Not on board. Taken on board.

Coram

AI extract

S.J. Vazifdar

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Bombay HC
Decided on: 26 Mar 2012 · March
Registered: 3 Mar 2012
Case no.: S/574/2012

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from S.j. Vazifdar

Usv Ltd. Vs Alkem Laboratories Ltd. and Anr.
22 Mar 2012
Usv Ltd. Vs Alkem Laboratories Ltd. and Anr.
22 Mar 2012
Jigna Sujit Doshi Vs Mohd. Iqbal @ M. Iqbal
22 Mar 2012
Manoj K. Soni Vs Ramsurat R Yadav
26 Mar 2012

Cite this judgement

Mozam Ali v. Chandrashekhar P. Shelar, S/574/2012 (BOM), decided on 26 March 2012.

The Bombay High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

S.J. Vazifdar

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Suit disposed of in terms of consent terms signed by parties and their advocates.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

The suit is disposed of mutatis mutandis in terms of the consent terms signed by the parties and their advocates taken on record. The undertakings contained therein are accepted by the Court.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

1 The suit is disposed of in terms of the consent terms, signed by the parties and their advocates taken on record and marked ‘X’. The undertakings contained therein are accepted. The advocates state that

both the parties are present in Court.

Refund of court fees, if any, as per Rules.

2 -

37.s.574.12

CNR

HCBM020055552012

Topic

Civil Procedure and Limitation

Bench

Disposal

CONSENT TERM

Mozam Ali Vs Chandrashekhar P. Shelar

26 Mar 2012

Manoj K. Soni Vs Ramsurat R Yadav

26 Mar 2012