The suit was disposed of between the plaintiffs and certain defendants by consent. The suit against remaining defendants was not pressed.
Suit disposed by consent; suit against remaining defendants not pressed; refund as per rules.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
sl573-12
1
vai
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT (LODGING) NO.573 OF 2012
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION (LODGING) NO.742 OF 2012 IN SUIT (LODGING) NO.573 OF 2012
Rajni Sethi & Anr.
....Plaintiffs
V/s.
Parinee Realtors Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
....Defendants
Mr.Prakash Shah with Ms.Archana Gupte i/b Prakash Shah & Associates for the Plaintiffs.
Mr.Nivit Srivastava with Mr.Nikhil Karnawat i/b M/s.Maniar Srivastava Associates for Defendant Nos.1, 4 and 5.
CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 9TH MARCH, 2012.
P.C. :-
1. The suit is disposed of between the plaintiffs and defendant
Nos.1, 4 and 5 in terms of the consent terms signed by them and their
advocates, tendered in Court, taken on record and marked “X”. The undertakings contained therein are accepted.
2 sl573-12
Refund, if any, as per rules.
The notice of motion is also accordingly disposed of.
Rajni Sethi
Parinee Realtors Pvt. Ltd.
S.J. VAZIFDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
