When the petitioner withdrew the criminal writ petition, the court declined to adjudicate the prayer for earlier maintenance and held such pleas must be agitated before the learned Judge handling the Section 125 application.
Relief regarding grant of earlier maintenance dismissed to be pursued before Section 125 Judge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP 929.11.sxw
1
JPP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 929 OF 2011
Mr. Shyamsunder R. Yadav.
... Petitioner.
V/s.
Mrs. Sunita Shyamsunder Yadav & Ors.
... Respondents.
Mr. Manish N. Jain for the Petitioner. Mr. S.S. Pednekar, APP for the State.
CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J.
DATED : 22nd SEPTEMBER 2011.
P.C. :-
Heard.
(K.U. CHANDIWAL,J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the point of grant of earlier maintenance can be considered in this criminal writ petition or before the learned Judge dealing with application under Section 125 of Cr.P.C.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
JPP
Mrs. Sunita Shyamsunder Yadav & Ors.
K.U. CHANDIWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
