Writ petition challenging the rejection of an application for local inspection in a suit regarding co-owned property. The High Court affirmed the Trial Court's discretion.
Writ petition dismissed. No costs awarded. Trial Court's discretion affirmed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 WP 8730.2011
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 8730 OF 2011
Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
Mr. M.B.Kolpe, Advocate for the Petitioner.
CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 17/11/2011.
PER COURT :
2 WP 8730.2011
3 WP 8730.2011
discretion. No case for interference is made out. As such, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs.
[ S.V. GANGAPURWALA,J. ]
KNP/WP 8730.2011
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should have intervened in the trial Court's discretion to reject an application for local inspection.
Petitioner
Original Defendant
S.V. Gangapurwala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
