Petitioner's counsel informed the court of the respondent's death and submitted withdrawal instructions. Leave was granted to withdraw the writ petition, which was subsequently dismissed as withdrawn.
Leave granted to withdraw the petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
WP-8683-2004
srk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8683 OF 2004
The State of Maharashtra
...Petitioners
Vs.
Shri Dhanpal Babgonda Patil
...Respondent
Mr.A.I.Patel, AGP for petitioner. Mr.N.V.Bandiwadekar for respondent.
CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ.
November 22, 2011.
P.C.
11/11/2007 and, therefore, he has written instructions to withdraw the
petition. A copy of the written instructions dated 3/11/2011 along with a copy of the death certificate is taken on record.
2
WP-8683-2004
discharged. No costs.
(SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)
The State of Maharashtra
Shri Dhanpal Babgonda Patil
B. H. Marlapalle
Nishita Mhatre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
