In a writ petition regarding cadre inclusion of civil engineering assistants, the High Court at Aurangabad expedited the Industrial Court proceedings to a one-year limit and ordered status quo maintenance pending the decision.
Proceedings before the Industrial Court expedited; decision to be made within one year; status quo maintained.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
wp86.11
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 86 OF 2011
_____________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | appearances, Court's | Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or | directions and | Registrar's orders |
Mr. D.R. Irale Patil, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. D.R. Korde, A.G.P. for respondent no.1 Mr. U.B. Bonder, Advocate for respondent nos.2 to 4.
2
wp86.11
in this connection to urge that this aspect, has been lost sight of.
3
wp86.11
maintain status-quo as on today till then.
(B.P. DHARMADHIKARI) JUDGE.
10.01.2011 gas/wp86.11
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner possessing requisite qualifications be included in the cadre of Civil Engineering Assistant despite the post held by them.
Whether the impugned order passed by the Industrial Court in Complaint ULP No. 69/2009 needs to be expedited.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Petitioner
Zilla Parishad
Respondent no.1
Respondent nos.2 to 4
B.P. DHARMADHIKARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
