The court rejected a writ petition challenging a work order as it was barred because the work had already commenced, concluding that the petition could not be entertained.
The petition is rejected; there is no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp8503.11.sxw
1
ssm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 8503 OF 2011
CS Datamation Research Services Pvt. Ltd.
....Petitioners.
Vs.
State of Maharashtra Through Department of Education & Ors.
...Respondents.
Mr. P.G. Thorat i/by Mr. Jay K. Bhatia for the Petitioners. Ms. Shyamali Gadre i/by M/s. Little & Co. for Respondent Nos. 2 to 6.
CORAM :- D.K DESHMUKH AND ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ.
DATE :- 17 OCTOBER, 2011.
P.C. :-
The learned counsel appearing for Respondent Nos. 2 to 6 states
that the work order awarding the contract to Respondent No.7 has been issued on 19 September 2011 and Respondent No.7 has completed almost 50% of the work. Statement is accepted.
is rejected. There shall be no order as to costs.
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition challenging a work order can be entertained when the work has already commenced.
CS Datamation Research Services Pvt. Ltd.
State of Maharashtra Through Department of Education
D.K. Deshmukh
Anoop V. Mohta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
