Order withdrawing writ petition No. 8424 of 2011. On instructions from the petitioner, counsel sought leave to withdraw the petition on settlement. The court allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the matter accordingly.
Writ petition disposed of as withdrawn with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp 8424.11
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 8424 OF 2011
Udhav Eknathrao Markad .. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents
Shri N. R. Bhavar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri S. D. Kaldate, A.G.P. for the Respondent/State.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 09TH NOVEMBER, 2011.
PER COURT :
. Shri Bhavar, the learned counsel has placed on record the communication received by him from the petitioner instructing him to withdraw the writ petition on account of settlement. Said communication is taken on record and marked “X” for identification.
2 wp 8424.11
[ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ]
bsb/Nov. 11
Udhav Eknathrao Markad
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. Gangapurwala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
