The High Court held that nothing required consideration as local police had already registered an FIR based on the petitioner's complaint during the pendency of the writ petition, thus disposing of the matter accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PPD
1
9.wp.62-11
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.62 OF 2011
Mrs.Shradha w/o. Vikas Ganeriwal.
..Petitioner.
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent.
Mr.A.M. Saraogi, Advocate for the Petitioner. Ms.M.H. Mhatre, A.P.P. for the State.
CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR AND A.R. JOSHI, JJ.
DATED : 10th FEBRUARY, 2011.
P.C.
local Police have registered FIR on the basis of complaint made by the
Petitioner dated 7th October, 2010. Thus, nothing survives for
consideration in the present Petition. Petition is disposed of accordingly.
(A. R. JOSHI, J.) (A. M. KHANWILKAR, J.)
Mrs. Shraddha w/o. Vikas Ganeriwal
The State of Maharashtra
A.M. Khanwilkar
A.R. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
