The High Court of Judicature at Bombay allowed Criminal Writ Petition No. 60 of 2011 to be withdrawn by the petitioners with liberty to file a fresh writ challenging the FiR.
Petition allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file another writ petition challenging the validity of the F.I.R.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
wp-60-2011.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Criminal Writ Petition No. 60 of 2011
Ronald Rodrigues & anr
.. Petitioners.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & ors.. Respondents.
Mr Sushan Kunjuraman & Mahesh Kadam, Advocate for the Petitioners.
Mr K. V. Saste, A.P.P.for the State.
CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR & A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 19TH JANUARY,2011.
P.C.:-
Counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of the subsequent
development in the matter, the petitioners would withdraw this petition with liberty to file another writ petition challenging the validity of the F.I.R.,registered. Writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn, with
liberty as prayed.
(A.R.JOSHI,J)
(A.M. KHANWILKAR,J)
Ronald Rodrigues
The State of Maharashtra
A.M. Khanwilkar
A.R. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court