The Court rejected a writ petition on the grounds that there was no reference to any statutory right of the petitioner being infringed, rendering the petition non-entertainable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 WP4932/11
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.4932 OF 2011
Shri Girish D. Sahastrabudhe
...Petitioner
v/s
Maharashtra State Road Transport
Corporation and others ...Respondents
Mr Rajesh S. Patil for Petitioner.
Ms P.M. Bhansali i/b Mr G.S. Hegde for Respondent
Nos.1 to 3.
CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH AND ANOOP V. MOHTA JJ.
DATE : 17TH DECEMBER 2011.
2 WP4932/11
P.C.:-
1]There is no reference to any statutory
right of the petitioner which has been infringed.
Petition cannot be entertained. It is rejected.
Parties to act on the copy of this order
duly authenticated by the Sheristedar / Private
Secretary of this Court.
Certified copy expedited.
( JUSTICE D.K. DESHMUKH )
( JUSTICE ANOOP V. MOHTA )
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition can be entertained where no statutory right of the petitioner is shown to be infringed.
Shri Girish D. Sahastrabudhe
Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation
D.K. Deshmukh
Anoop V. Mohta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court