The petition was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the absence of the counsel for the petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1412wp4783.11
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.4783 OF 2011
(Rushibaba Shikshan Prasarak Sanstha and another vs. Deputy Director of Education, Amravati and others)
__________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
CORAM : D.D. SINHA AND A.P. BHANGALE, JJ.
DATED : DECEMBER 14, 2011
The Counsel for the petitioners is absent. Hence, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
JUDGE JUDGE
khj
Rushibaba Shikshan Prasarak Sanstha
another
Deputy Director of Education, Amravati
others
D.D. SINHA
A.P. BHANGALE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
