The High Court at Nagpur held the writ petition infructuous due to the withdrawal of the tender notice and disposed of the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 4278 OF 2011. M/s. Dattatraya Advertising Company .vs. Nagpur Municipal Corporation & others
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Mr. K.V. Deshmukh, Advocate for petitioner,
CORAM : S.A. BOBDE & M.N. GILANI, JJ.
DATED : SEPTEMBER 28, 2011.
Mr. K.V. Deshmukh, learned Advocate for
petitioner, states that the petition has become infructuous because of the withdrawal of the tender notice in pursuance of the statement made in P.I.L. No. 28/11 as recorded in the order of the Court dated 19.9.2011.
Hence, the petition is disposed of as such.
Judge Judge.
J.
M/s. Dattatraya Advertising Company
Nagpur Municipal Corporation & others
S.A. Bobde
M.N. Gilani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court