Petitioners through counsel sought and obtained permission to withdraw the writ petition to pursue an alternate remedy before the Cooperative Court, Mumbai.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp-3675-11.doc
1
Ladda
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL WRIT PETITION No. 3675 of 2011.
Smt Nita Sharad Raulgaonkar & Anr
...Petitioners.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & ors.
...Respondents.
Mr R.M. Momin, Advocate for the Petitioners.
Mr P.S. Cardozo, Assistant Government Pleader, for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3.
Mr Shreepad Murthy with Mr Ashutosh Singh, Advocate for Respondent No.6.
CORAM: D.D. SINHA AND A.R.JOSHI, JJ.
DATED:- 28th June, 2011.
P.C.
Assistant Government Pleader for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and the
learned counsel for Respondent No.6.
Ladda 2 wp-3675-11.doc
withdrawn.
(A.R.JOSHI, J.)
Smt Nita Sharad Raulgaonkar & Anr
The State of Maharashtra
D.D. SINHA
A.R. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
