In deference to the observations made by the Court, Counsel for the petitioners submits, on instructions, that the petitioner would withdraw this petition with liberty to pursue other appropriate remedy before the concerned Court. Petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp-360-11.doc
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 360 OF 2011.
Zahid Hussein Khan & anr
...Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and Anr
...Respondents.
Mr E. A. Sasi & Ms Seema Hunnarkar for Petitioner.
Ms S.V.Gajare, A.P.P.for the State
CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND
A.R.JOSHI, JJ. DATED:- 15th February, 2011.
P.C.
In deference to the observations made by the Court, Counsel
for the petitioners submits, on instructions, that the petitioner
would withdraw this petition with liberty to pursue other
appropriate remedy before the concerned Court. Petition is allowed
to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed.
(A.R.JOSHI, J.)
(A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)
Zahid Hussein Khan & anr
The State of Maharashtra and Anr
A.M.KHANWILKAR
A.R.JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
