Writ petition allowed to withdraw with liberty to file afresh on the same cause of action. No substantive reasoning or parties named.
Petition allowed to withdraw with liberty to file afresh on same cause of action.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
wp358.11
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.358 OF 2011
_____________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | appearances, Court's | Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or | directions and | Registrar's orders |
_____________________________________________________________________ Mrs. Vaishali Deshmukh, Advocate holding for Mr. V.D. Salunke, Advocate for petitioner.
(B.P. DHARMADHIKARI) JUDGE
20.01.2011 sut/Jan11/wp358.11
BP DHARMADHIKARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
