This court dismissed the writ petition filed by a petitioner seeking compassionate pension. The court held that the petitioner was not entitled to the pension as he had been dismissed from service.
Petition rejected on the ground that the petitioner was not entitled to compassionate pension.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1) wp3547-11
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 3547 OF 2011
Madhavrao Gabajirao Pimpaliskar PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & others RESPONDENTS
.....
Mr. Pawan B. Pawar, advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. K.S. Patil, A.G.P. for the Respondent-State.
.....
DATED : 24th AUGUST, 2011
ORAL ORDER:
1.We do not find any merit in this petition.
The petitioner has been held not to be entitled for
compassionate pension on the ground that the
petitioner was dismissed from service. Hence, the
petition is rejected.
npj/wp3547-11
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to compassionate pension when he was dismissed from service.
Madhavrao Gabajirao Pimpaliskar
The State of Maharashtra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court