This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp348.11.sxw
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 348 OF 2011
M/s. Alta Laboratories Ltd. ....Petitioner.
Vs.
Raju Mogal Pacharane
....Respondent.
Mr. Neel Helekar for the Petitioner.
Ms. Rita Nadar i/by Mr. K. Kumar Vaidyanathan for the Respondent.
CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.
DATE : 1st APRIL, 2011
P.C.:
The parties have arrived at settlement and accordingly signed
the consent terms. The same is also signed by the respective advocates. The consent terms is taken on record and marked "X" for identification. There is no objection of any kind.
2 The Petition is, accordingly, disposed of in view of the consent terms.
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
M/s. Alta Laboratories Ltd.
Raju Mogal Pacharane
Anoop V. Mohta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
