The petitioner challenged his election to the 'A' constituency of Taloda block. The court found that the Returning Officer had already declared the petitioner duly elected on 13-1-2011, rendering the petition infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD.
WRIT PETITION NO. 32 OF 2011
Bharat Babanrao Mali, Age : 44 years, Occupation : Business, R/o. Taloda, Taluka : Taloda, .. Petitioner District : Nandurbar. (Original Objector)
versus
The State of Maharashtra, Through Secretary, Cooperative Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai, and 5 others. .. Respondents.
Mr. Amol S. Sawant, Advocate, for the petitioner (Absent).
Mr. D.R. Korde, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent nos.1 to 3.
Mr. P.D. Bachate, Advocate, for respondent no.5.
(2)
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.
DATE : 14TH JANUARY 2011
COURT'S ORDER :
1. None for the petitioner.
(3)
( B.P. DHARMADHIKARI ) JUDGE
bgp/wp32
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging the election result remains maintainable after the petitioner's election is declared valid by the Returning Officer.
Bharat Babanrao Mali
The State of Maharashtra, Through Secretary, Cooperative Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai
B.P. DHARMADHIKARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
