The High Court at Aurangabad Bench disposed of Writ Petition No. 3199 of 1994, where the petitioner sought leave to withdraw the petition, which was allowed by the Court as there was no objection from the respondents.
Petition disposed of as withdrawn; Rule discharged; No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD.
WRIT PETITION NO. 3199 OF 1994
Maruti s/o. Ganpati Ghanvate, Age : 30 years, Occupation : Service, .. Petitioner R/o. Gangakhed, (Original District : Parbhani. complainant)
versus
Mr. A.S. Shelke, Advocate, holding for Mr. S.K. Shelke, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mrs. V.A. Shinde, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent nos.1 and 2.
(2)
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.
DATE : 17TH FEBRUARY 2011
COURT'S ORDER :
bgp/wp3199
Maruti s/o. Ganpati Ghanvate
The Deputy Director of Social Forestry, District : Parbhani
The Plantation Officer, Social Forestry Department, Gangakhed, Dist. Parbhani
B.P. DHARMADHIKARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
